[Black box: Attenders with psychosocial needs in the emergency department]. / Blackbox: Psychosoziale Fälle in der Notaufnahme.

OBJECTIVES: The aims are (a) assessment of the prevalence of psychosocial emergencies in the emergency department (ED), (b) determination of the proportion of cases not coded as diagnosis (unreported cases), and (c) characterization of identified patients. METHODS: In a retrospective study, psychosocial emergencies in one week were identified from routine documentation of the central ED of the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte (CCM). After exclusion of planned admitted cases, 862 patients were included in the study. The identified psychosocial emergencies were descriptively analyzed with regard to their sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and compared with other emergencies. RESULTS: The prevalence of psychosocial emergencies in the reported period was 11.9% (n = 103). A large proportion of psychosocial emergencies were not coded (35.9%) or not fully coded (20.4%) as an ICD diagnosis (unreported cases). There was a statistically relevant difference in gender distribution with a significantly higher proportion of males among psychosocial emergencies (70.9%) compared to other emergencies (50.7%; p < 0.0001). The two most common treatment causes among psychosocial emergencies were substance abuse (66.0%) and homelessness (20.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a relevant proportion of psychosocial emergencies among all treatments in ED routine data and a high proportion of cases not captured in the coded diagnoses. EDs thus represent an important point of contact for vulnerable patient groups but standardized screening and identification are still lacking.

Patients pathways before and after treatments in emergency departments: A retrospective analysis of secondary data in Germany.

Increasing emergency department (ED) utilization induces considerable pressure on ED staff and organization in Germany. Reasons for certain ED attendances are seen partly in insufficient continuity of care outside of hospitals. To explore the health care patterns before and after an ED attendance in Germany, we used claims data from nine statutory health insurance funds, covering around 25 % of statutory health insurees (1). We descriptively analyzed ED attendances for adult patients in 2016 according to their sociodemographic characteristics and diagnoses (2). Based on the ED attendance as initial event, we investigated health care provider utilization 180 days before and after the respective ED treatment and are presented by means of Sankey diagrams. In total, 4,757,536 ED cases of 3,164,343 insured individuals were analyzed. Back pain was the most frequent diagnosis in outpatient ED cases (5.0 %), and 80.2 % of the patients visited primary care physicians or specialists 180 days before and 78.8 % 180 days after ED treatment. Among inpatient cases, heart failure (4.6 %) was the leading diagnosis and 74.6 % used primary care physicians or specialists 180 days before and 65.1 % 180 days after ED treatment. The ED re-attendance slightly increased for back pain (4.9 % to 7.9 %) and decreased for heart failure (13.4 % to 12.6 %).

Utilization of innovative medical technologies in German inpatient care: does evidence matter?

BACKGROUND: The reimbursement of new technologies in inpatient care is not always linked to a requirement for evidence-based evaluation of patient benefit. In Germany, every new technology approved for market was until recently eligible for reimbursement in inpatient care unless explicitly excluded. The aim of this work was (1) to investigate the type of evidence that was available at the time of introduction of 25 innovative technologies and how this evidence evolved over time, and (2) to explore the relationship between clinical evidence and utilization for these technologies in German inpatient care. METHODS: This study combined different methods. A systematic search for evidence published between 2003 and 2017 was conducted in four bibliographic databases, clinical trial registries, resources for clinical guidelines, and health technology assessment-databases. Information was also collected on funding mechanisms and safety notices. Utilization was measured by hospital procedures captured in claims data. The body of evidence, funding and safety notices per technology were analyzed descriptively. The relationship between utilization and evidence was explored empirically using a multilevel regression analysis. RESULTS: The number of included publications per technology ranges from two to 498. For all technologies, non-comparative studies form the bulk of the evidence. The number of randomized controlled clinical trials per technology ranges from zero to 19. Some technologies were utilized for several years without an adequate evidence base. A relationship between evidence and utilization could be shown for several but not all technologies. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals a mixed picture regarding the evidence available for new technologies, and the relationship between the development of evidence and the use of technologies over time. Although the influence of funding and safety notices requires further investigation, these results re-emphasize the need for strengthening market approval standards and HTA pathways as well as approaches such as coverage with evidence development.

Oral health status and coverage of oral health care: A five-country comparison.

Oral health has received increased attention in health services research and policy. This study aims to assess oral health outcomes and public coverage of oral health services in Belgium, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain. Various indicators were used to compare oral health outcomes concerning the most common disorders by age group. Coverage of oral health services was analyzed according to the dimensions of the WHO Universal Coverage Cube. The results showed major differences in the coverage of services for the adult population: coverage was most comprehensive in Germany, followed by Belgium and Denmark. In Spain and the Netherlands, public coverage was limited. Except in Spain, coverage of oral health services for children was high, although with some differences between countries. Regarding oral health outcomes measured by the T-Health index, no country showed outstanding results across all age groups. While Denmark, the Netherlands, and Spain performed above average among 5- to 7-year-olds, Denmark and Germany performed above average among 12- to 14-year-olds, the Netherlands, Spain, and Belgium among 35- to 44-year-olds, and Belgium and the Netherlands among 65- to 74-year-olds. The selection of countries of this study was limited due to the availability and quality of oral health data demonstrating the urgent need for the European member states to establish corresponding databases.

Promoting the systematic use of real-world data and real-world evidence for digital health technologies across Europe: a consensus framework.

Despite the acceleration in the use of digital health technologies across different aspects of the healthcare system, the full potential of real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) arising from the technologies is not being utilised in decision-making. We examine current national efforts and future opportunities to systematically use RWD and RWE in decision-making in five countries (Estonia, Finland, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom), and then develop a framework for promotion of the systematic use of RWD and RWE. A review assesses current national efforts, complemented with a three-round consensus-building exercise among an international group of experts (n1 = 44, n2 = 24, n3 = 24) to derive key principles. We find that Estonia and Finland have invested and developed digital health-related policies for several years; Germany and Italy are the more recent arrivals, while the United Kingdom falls somewhere in the middle. Opportunities to promote the systematic use of RWD and RWE were identified for each country. Eight building blocks principles were agreed through consensus, relating to policy scope, institutional role and data collection. Promoting post-market surveillance and digital health technology vigilance ought to rely on clarity in scope and data collection with consensus reached on eight principles to leverage RWD and RWE.

Changing roles of health insurers in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: any lessons to learn from Bismarckian systems?

Bismarckian health systems are mainly governed by social health insurers, but their role, status, and power vary across countries and over time. We compare the role of health insurers in three distinct social health insurance systems in improving health systems' efficiency. In France, insurers work together as a single payer within a highly regulated context. Although this gives insurers substantial bargaining power, collective negotiations with providers are highly political and do not provide appropriate incentives for efficiency. Both Germany and the Netherlands have introduced competition among insurers to foster efficiency. However, the rationale of insurer competition in Germany is unclear because contracts are mostly concluded at a collective level and individual insurers have little power to influence health system efficiency. In the Netherlands, insurer competition is substantially more effective, but primarily focused on price and cost containment. In all three countries, the role of insurers has been transforming slowly to respond to common challenges of assuring care quality and continuity for an ageing population. To assure sustainability, they need to ensure that care providers cooperate with the same quality and efficiency objectives, but their capacity to do so has been limited by insufficient support to enforce public information on provider quality.

Applying a data-driven population segmentation approach in German claims data.

BACKGROUND: Segmenting the population into homogenous groups according to their healthcare needs may help to understand the population's demand for healthcare services and thus support health systems to properly allocate healthcare resources and plan interventions. It may also help to reduce the fragmented provision of healthcare services. The aim of this study was to apply a data-driven utilisation-based cluster analysis to segment a defined population in the south of Germany. METHODS: Based on claims data of one big German health insurance a two-stage clustering approach was applied to group the population into segments. A hierarchical method (Ward's linkage) was performed to determine the optimal number of clusters, followed by a k-means cluster analysis using age and healthcare utilisation data in 2019. The resulting segments were described in terms of their morbidity, costs and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: The 126,046 patients were divided into six distinct population segments. Healthcare utilisation, morbidity and demographic characteristics differed significantly across the segments. The segment "High overall care use" comprised the smallest share of patients (2.03%) but accounted for 24.04% of total cost. The overall utilisation of services was higher than the population average. In contrast, the segment "Low overall care use" included 42.89% of the study population, accounting for 9.94% of total cost. Utilisation of services by patients in this segment was lower than population average. CONCLUSION: Population segmentation offers the opportunity to identify patient groups with similar healthcare utilisation patterns, patient demographics and morbidity. Thereby, healthcare services could be tailored for groups of patients with similar healthcare needs.

Robotic-assisted surgery for prostatectomy - does the diffusion of robotic systems contribute to treatment centralization and influence patients' hospital choice?

BACKGROUND: Between 2008 and 2018, the share of robotic-assisted surgeries (RAS) for radical prostatectomies (RPEs) has increased from 3 to 46% in Germany. Firstly, we investigate if this diffusion of RAS has contributed to RPE treatment centralization. Secondly, we analyze if a hospital's use of an RAS system influenced patients' hospital choice. METHODS: To analyze RPE treatment centralization, we use (bi-) annual hospital data from 2006 to 2018 for all German hospitals in a panel-data fixed effect model. For investigating RAS systems' influence on patients' hospital choice, we use patient level data of 4614 RPE patients treated in 2015. Employing a random utility choice model, we estimate the influence of RAS as well as specialization and quality on patients' marginal utilities and their according willingness to travel. RESULTS: Despite a slight decrease in RPEs between 2006 and 2018, hospitals that invested in an RAS system could increase their case volumes significantly (+ 82% compared to hospitals that did not invest) contributing to treatment centralization. Moreover, patients are willing to travel longer for hospitals offering RAS (+ 22% than average travel time) and for specialization (+ 13% for certified prostate cancer treatment centers, + 9% for higher procedure volume). The influence of outcome quality and service quality on patients' hospital choice is insignificant or negligible. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, centralization is partly driven by (very) high-volume hospitals' investment in RAS systems and patient preferences. While outcome quality might improve due to centralization and according specialization, evidence for a direct positive influence of RAS on RPE outcomes still is ambiguous. Patients have been voting with their feet, but research yet has to catch up.

Patients' preferences in dental care: A discrete-choice experiment and an analysis of willingness-to-pay.

INTRODUCTION: Dental diseases are a major problem worldwide. Costs are a burden on healthcare systems and patients. Missed treatments can have health and financial consequences. Compared to other health services, dental treatments are only covered in parts by statutory health insurance (SHI). Using the example of dental crowns for a cost-intensive treatment, our study aims to investigate whether (1) certain treatment attributes determine patients' treatment choice, and (2) out-of-pocket payments represent a barrier to access dental care. METHODS: We conducted a discrete-choice-experiment by mailing questionnaires to 10,752 people in Germany. In presented scenarios the participants could choose between treatment options (A, B, or none) composed of treatment attribute levels (e.g., color of teeth) for posterior (PT) and anterior teeth (AT). Considering interaction effects, we used a D-efficient fractional factorial design. Choice analysis was performed using different models. Furthermore, we analyzed willingness-to-pay (WTP), preference of choosing no and SHI standard care treatment, and influence of socioeconomic characteristics on individual WTP. RESULTS: Out of n = 762 returned questionnaires (response rate of r = 7.1), n = 380 were included in the analysis. Most of the participants are in age group "50 to 59 years" (n = 103, 27.1%) and female (n = 249, 65.5%). The participants' benefit allocations varied across treatment attributes. Aesthetics and durability of dental crowns play most important roles in decision-making. WTP regarding natural color teeth is higher than standard SHI out-of-pocket payment. Estimations for AT dominate. For both tooth areas, "no treatment" was a frequent choice (PT: 25.7%, AT: 37.2%). Especially for AT, treatment beyond SHI standard care was often chosen (49.8%, PT: 31.3%). Age, gender, and incentive measures (bonus booklet) influenced WTP per participant. CONCLUSION: This study provides important insights into patient preferences for dental crown treatment in Germany. For our participants, aesthetic for AT and PT as well as out-of-pocket payments for PT play an important role in decision-making. Overall, they are willing to pay more than the current out-of-pockt payments for what they consider to be better crown treatments. Findings may be valuable for policy makers in developing measures that better match patient preferences.

Recording early deaths following emergency department visits in inpatient data: An observational study using data of 16 German hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: In German hospital emergency departments (EDs), no definite reimbursement rules exist for patients who die within 24 hours after arrival. Our study aimed to assess whether these cases were recorded and billed as inpatient stays. Furthermore, characteristics of patients who die within 24 hours following arrival at the ED were investigated for all ED visits, as well as for the subgroup of ED visits with an ED diagnosis or inpatient principal diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: This study was part of the INDEED project, which aimed to explore utilization and trans-sectoral patterns of care for patients treated in EDs in Germany. The study population includes ED visits of adult patients in 2016 in 16 German hospitals participating in the project. In the data set of combined ED, inpatient, and outpatient treatment information early deaths were classified as patients who died in the ED or in the hospital within 24 hours after arrival. Characteristics of visits followed by early death were analyzed descriptively. Mode of billing as inpatient or outpatient was validated by identifying corresponding billing information using linked inpatient and outpatient data. RESULTS: In 2016, 454,747 ED visits of adult patients occurred in the participating hospitals and 42.8% resulted in inpatient admission. Among these inpatients 8,317 (4.3%) died during the overall hospital stay, and 1,302 (0.7%) died within 24 hours following arrival. The proportion of early deaths among all deaths in patients with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction was higher (27%) compared to the overall patient population (16%). Although all cases of early death were classified as inpatients the corresponding inpatient data was missing in 1.9% of all early deaths and in 3.4% of early deaths with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Outpatient billing information suggesting that these cases were billed as outpatients, was found in 0.3% of all early deaths and in 0.8 to 1.7% of early deaths with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, respectively. CONCLUSION: In-hospital mortality might be biased by incomplete recording of early deaths in inpatient data. However, the proportion of patients with early death who were billed as outpatients was marginal in the investigated study population of 16 hospitals. Although the study results are limited by restricted generalizability and subpar data quality, this finding indicates that early deaths might be almost completely recorded in German inpatient data. Nevertheless, data quality should be enhanced by establishing general billing rules for cases with a short treatment duration due to early death.

Digital health applications and the fast-track pathway to public health coverage in Germany: challenges and opportunities based on first results.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence-based decision-making is the sine qua non for safe and effective patient care and the long-term functioning of health systems. Since 2020 Digital Health Applications (DiHA) in Germany have been undergoing a systematic pathway to be reimbursed by statutory health insurance (SHI) which is attracting attention in other European countries. We therefore investigate coverage decisions on DiHA and the underlying evidence on health care effects, which legally include both medical outcomes and patient-centred structural and procedural outcomes. METHODS: Based on publicly available data of the Institute for Medicines and Medical Devices searched between 08/2021 and 02/2022, all DiHA listed in the corresponding registry and thus reimbursable by the SHI were systematically investigated and presented descriptively on the basis of predefined criteria, such as clinical condition, and costs. The clinical trials on DiHA permanently included in the registry were reviewed with regard to their study design, endpoints investigated, the survey instruments used, and whether an intention-to-treat analysis was performed. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROB II tool. RESULTS: By February 2022, 30 DiHA had been included in the DiHA registry, one third of them permanently and two thirds conditionally. Most DiHA were therapeutic applications for mental illness based on cognitive behavioural therapy. For all permanently included DiHA, randomised controlled trials were conducted to demonstrate the impact on health care effects. While medical outcomes were investigated for all of these DiHA, patient-centred structural and procedural outcomes were rarely investigated. The majority of clinical trials showed a high risk of bias, mainly due to insufficient reporting quality. Overall, the prices for DiHA covered by SHI are on average around € 150 per month (min. € 40; max. € 248). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based decision-making on coverage of DiHA leaves room for improvements both in terms of reporting-quality and the use of patient-centred structural and procedural outcomes in addition to medical outcomes. With appropriate evidence, DiHA can offer an opportunity as an adjunct to existing therapy while currently the high risk of bias of the trials raises doubts about the justification of its high costs.

Reasons for (not) choosing dental treatments-A qualitative study based on patients' perspective.

Oral health is increasingly seen as a public health challenge due to the remarkable prevalence of oral diseases worldwide, the impact on general health, and health consequences that can arise for individuals. Compared to other health services, oral health services are usually not fully covered by statutory health insurance, which is seen as one reason in decision-making on dental treatments. Nevertheless, patients' reasons for treatment decisions are not well understood although they can provide valuable insights. The objective of this study was to identify reasons of choice for dental treatments and to explore patients' view on cost coverage in Germany. We conducted four focus group interviews with a total of 27 participants. The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Data was analyzed performing conventional content analysis. As part of a qualitative analysis, subcategories and categories were formed from identified reasons using an inductive approach. Our study supports and expands research in exploring patients' decision-making on dental treatments. It highlights a variety of 53 reasons of choice for dental treatments from patients' perspective, split in two categories "health care service", and "dentist & dental office". First category includes reasons regarding dental care performance (subcategories: "preconditions", "treatment", "costs", and "outcomes"). Second category demonstrates reasons regarding dentists, office structures and processes (subcategories: "professional skills", "social skills", "office staff & equipment", and "office processes"). Reasons named "most important" by the participants are out-of-pocket payments, dentists' training, and a relationship of trust between patient and dentist. Although the participants use incentive measures to lower financial burden, several perceived challenges exist. Identified reasons for choosing dental treatments provide a basis for further studies to quantify the relevance of these reasons from patients' perspective. Based on this, the various reasons identified can be considered in future policies to improve patients' utilization behavior, which can range from improved information sources to increased incentive measures.

[Direct admission of patients to doctors' offices by prehospital emergency services-an effective method to relieve emergency departments? : Analysis of routine pre- and in-hospital emergency data]. / Mit dem Rettungsdienst direkt in die Arztpraxis ­ eine wirkungsvolle Entlastung der Notaufnahmen? : Analyse von notfallmedizinischen Routinedaten aus Präklinik und Klinik.

BACKGROUND: In the 2018 advisory opinion concerning the realignment of healthcare, it is advocated that in order to relieve pressure on emergency departments (ED) prehospital medical emergency services should be given the option to directly transport suitable patients to doctors' offices. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of patients treated by prehospital emergency services that have the potential to be directly allocated to a primary care provider. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preclinical and clinical data of adult patients who in a 2-month period were transported to the ED of a university hospital by an ambulance were evaluated. To determine a safe and meaningful transport directly to a doctor's office, a stepwise assessment was carried out: patients were categorized on the basis of the prehospital assessment of urgency as "urgent" (contact to doctor necessary within a maximum time of 30 min) and "less urgent" (contact to doctor not necessary within 30 min, maximum 120 min). "Less urgent" patients were further divided and those treated as outpatients were identified. This group was further restricted to cases whose administrative reception in the ED was documented Monday-Friday between 8 am and 7 pm. In addition, these cases were further differentiated with regard to medical content and compared with the triage results in the ED (Manchester Triage, MTS). RESULTS: In all, 1260 patients were brought to the ED by ambulance within the study period (total number of patients treated in this time period n = 11,506); 894 cases had a documented prehospital level of urgency and could therefore be included. Of these n = 477 (53.4%) were categorized as "less urgent"; 317 (66.5%) of these "less urgent" cases were treated as outpatients in the ED, and n = 114 (23.9%) in a time frame potentially suitable for direct transport to doctors' offices, which is 1% of all patients treated in the ED in the time period examined. However, 70 of the cases suitable for doctors' office (63.6% of n = 110 with documented MTS) were rated more urgent in the ED. With regards to prehospital complaints and documented diagnosis we assume employment of a relevant amount of resources in the treatment of these cases. CONCLUSIONS: EDs could be relieved from every tenth patient brought in by prehospital emergency services (1% of all patients treated) during normal offices hours by direct allocation to doctors' offices. Regarding patient's safety this process however has to be seen critically as > 60% of these cases were potentially undertriaged. Necessary resources for diagnostics and treatment have to be available in the doctors' offices and known to prehospital emergency services. Primary assignment of patients to doctors' offices by prehospital emergency can only relieve urban EDs to a negligible extent, is potentially dangerous and linked to a tremendous logistic effort.

Adoption of large-scale medical equipment: the impact of competition in the German inpatient sector.

The availability of large-scale medical equipment such as computed tomography (CT), magnet resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) scanners has increased rapidly worldwide over the last decades. Among OECD countries, Germany ranks high according to the number of imaging technologies and their applications per inhabitant. In contrast to other countries, there is no active governmental planning of large-scale medical equipment. We therefore investigated whether and how the adoption and distribution of CT, MRI and PET scanners in the German inpatient sector is subject to competition. Using a linear-probability model, we additionally examined the impact of regional, hospital- and population-based factors. In summary, our results indicate that the adoption rate by hospital sites decreases with the number of other sites being already equipped with the respective device and their proximity. However, the effect presumably depends on the technologies' stage within the diffusion process. No influence regarding the amount of state subsidies could be identified. Furthermore, hospital size and university status strongly affect the adoption.

[Association between Safety Culture and Risk of Burnout: A Survey of Non-Medical Rescue Workers]. / Der Zusammenhang zwischen Sicherheitskultur und Burnout-Risiko: Eine Befragung nicht-ärztlicher Mitarbeiter im Rettungsdienst.

BACKGROUND: Stressors such as safety culture in organizations that increase the risk of burnout have been studied in nursing and inpatient care settings. However, investigations in the setting of preclinical emergency medical services (EMS) are still limited. The study aims at (1) investigating burnout in health care workers in preclinical EMS and their perceived safety culture, and (2) analyzing the association between the two. METHODS: Using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and the Emergency Medical Services - Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (EMS-SAQ), an online survey was conducted with non-medical health care workers in preclinical EMS. Descriptive analyses were performed using frequencies, mean values, percentages and the Pearson correlation coefficient. A logistic regression model was used to determine the relationship between safety culture and the risk of burnout. RESULTS: A total of 1,101 questionnaires was considered for analysis. Most of the participants were male (86.2%) and younger than 40 years (73.2%). A high risk of burnout for participants was found for the dimensions of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization (EE 26.3% and DP 40.2%). In the context of measuring safety culture, especially management, working conditions, and safety climate were negatively perceived by the participants. Furthermore, high stress recognition (EE: OR=3.317, p<0.01; DP: OR=1.910, p<0.01), negative job satisfaction (EE: OR=0.297, p<0.01; DP: OR=0.576, p<0.01) and negatively perceived working conditions (EE: OR 0.598, p<0.05; DP: 0.937, p<0.05) were significantly associated with a high risk of burnout. CONCLUSION: This is the first large scale study investigating burnout among non-medical health care workers in preclinical EMS and their perceived safety culture in Germany as well as the association between the two. The results show the necessity to focus on perceived dimensions of safety culture in organizations, to develop measures reducing stress and improve job satisfaction and working conditions. In the context of increasing skills shortage, this is especially relevant with regard to the challenges of patient safety and quality of outcomes in care.

[Large-Scale Medical Equipment - An Analysis of Supply Structures 20 Years after the Abolition of Site Planning]. / Medizintechnische Großgeräte ­ Eine Analyse der Versorgungsstrukturen 20 Jahre nach Aufhebung der Standortplanung.

AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the supply structures of computer tomographs (CT) and positron emission tomographs (PET) 20 years after abolishing site planning of large-scale medical equipment in the German inpatient sector. METHODOLOGY: Cartographic analyses were used to visualize the inpatient supply with CT and PET between 2010 and 2017. Regional differences were investigated in relation to population and disease burden to identify potentially over- and under-served areas. RESULTS: Almost German-wide coverage was observed for CT. Only 0.3 percent of the population did not have access to a device within 30 minutes of driving distance. In contrast, larger segments of the population in extensive regions did not have timely access to PET. In addition, there was a high degree of regional variation in supply, which could not be explained either by population density or the disease burden of the region. CONCLUSION: The supply structures of large-scale medical equipment over decades without concrete regulatory interventions reveal regional variation. This is to be viewed critically from both an economic and a medical perspective. The extent to which strengthening competitive elements or cross-sectoral site planning can lead to a demand-oriented and efficient supply of large-scale medical equipment still needs to be investigated in more detail.